Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Personal Injury Experts Caution Casinos Following $3 Million Jack Cincinnati Award to Injured Ohio Gambler editorial policy.
  1. Former Pamunkey Chief Slams Tribe’s Virginia Casino Push, Claims Billionaire Using Group

Compare Accounts
×
MGM Resorts Stock Usually Isn’t a Winning February Bet
Provider
Name
Description
Las Vegas Hotel Room Rates Plunge With No In-Person CES Event This Year  Judge Rules Against Harrah’s New Orleans, Casino Must Pay Hotel Comp Taxes  Canadian Gaming Association Joins ‘Three-Card Monte’ Case Against Atlantic Lottery Corp  New South Wales Gambling Pub Fined after Former Employee Snitches  Atlantic City Casino 2021 Profit Report Stirs Mixed Analysis  Trump Impeachment Odds Shorten, as President Continues to Lose Allies  New York Giants Running Back Saquon Barkley Avoids Contract Holdout  LVCVA Sin City Ad Campaign Celebrates Adult Freedom and ‘Only Vegas Moments’  Hong Kong Gambling Raid Results In Two Dead After Ill-Fated Attempt to Avoid Arrest  Nevada Rep. Dina Titus: Gaming Critical to State Economic Recoveries